Banner 8 Banner 7 Banner 6 Banner 4 Banner 3 Banner 5 Banner 2 Banner 1

Jun 2012

Jack Coakley secured the dismissal of race discrimination and harassment claims filed with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination by a former employee of an agency that provided residential, vocational and other supportive services to veterans of the United States Armed Forces.  The Complainant’s employment was terminated after he was absent for work without permission six out of seven consecutive work-days.  The Complainant alleged that he was terminated because of his race and that he had been subjected to harassment due to his race by a non-supervisory co-worker.  Jack Coakley presented evidence, however, that, prior to working for the agency, the Complainant was a client of the agency and was hired based upon the recommendation of the very same agency employee whom the Complainant later accused of harassment.  Evidence was also presented that, prior to the incidents that resulted in the Complainant’s termination, the Complainant had been involved in instances of absenteeism and publicly arguing with coworkers.  The Complainant’s employer, however, did not terminate the Complainant following these earlier instances of misconduct, but, instead, attempted to address these issues with reprimands.  These reprimands, unfortunately, did not succeed in preventing subsequent misconduct by the Complainant.  Jack Coakley argued that the agency’s initial use of sanctions less severe than termination demonstrated the absence of a discriminatory animus on the part of the agency.  Additionally, with respect to the claim of retaliation, the agency had documented not only the Complainant’s negative interactions with his coworker/alleged harasser, but also the fact that both the Complainant and the coworker were told to stay away from the other.  This reasonable and even-handed approach to what appeared (to the agency) to be personal disagreements unrelated to race between coworkers further evidenced a lack of discriminatory intent on the part of the agency.  After thoroughly investigating the allegations, the MCAD made lack of probable cause findings with respect to all of the Complainant’s claims and the case was dismissed.


Additional News & Notes

May 2017 - Murphy & Riley, P.C., is pleased to announce that Roger Soun has joined the firm.... [More]
Dec 2016 - The Supreme Judicial Court recently expanded the facts pursuant to which the “mode of operation”... [More]
Nov 2016 - Five Murphy & Riley attorneys named Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, a rating service that publishes... [More]
Oct 2016 - Lisa White was recently a panelist, for the second year in a row, at the... [More]
Oct 2016 - Murphy & Riley, P.C., is pleased to announce that Amy B. Welch has joined the... [More]
Jul 2016 - Joe King was recently elected President of the Frank J. Murray Inn of Court, which... [More]
Jun 2016 - Susan Donnelly Murphy, along with Lisa Oliver White, recently obtained a jury verdict in favor... [More]
May 2016 - Murphy & Riley, P.C., is pleased to announce that Paul R. Kennedy has joined the... [More]
Apr 2016 - In a matter of first impression for Massachusetts, on March 7, 2016, the Supreme Judicial... [More]
Apr 2016 - Jack Coakley recently prevailed in defeating a Plaintiff physician’s appeal of a defense verdict to... [More]
Apr 2016 - April 2016 Jack Coakley secured the dismissal of a hostile work environment claim filed with... [More]
Feb 2016 - Robert J. Murphy and Kevin M. Sullivan recently obtained a dismissal on behalf of a... [More]
Feb 2016 - Jack Coakley and Melissa Arnold were recently awarded summary judgment on behalf of a Massachusetts... [More]
Sep 2015 - In a recent unpublished decision, the Massachusetts Appeals Court held that a legal malpractice claim... [More]
Jun 2015 - Lisa Oliver White received the Rising Star Award from the Massachusetts Defense Lawyers Association at... [More]